The judge invented his own facts, his own law, and his own testimony in order to contort himself into justifying a seatbelt ticket for someone who was wearing a seatbelt and was illegally stopped. He found, based on no testimony from anyone, that I have a magical brake light that only malfunctions when this one cop looks at it, and works just fine for me and all the other cops who pull me over twice a month. Even after he found the other two accusations to be false, suddenly one of the two stories this cop gave about my seatbelt is so credible that it merits having some gaps filled in by a helpful judge. I don't recall any expert testimony about the ideal technique for seatbelt use. I just remember a cop testifying that I was wearing one.